Unknown

Sands of the Kalahari (1965) is a retro review brought on by its connection to Zulu via Stanley Baker and Cy Enfield. Both are cracking films and should be viewed to gain perspective of movies in the mid sixties.

Directed and adapted from William Mulvihill‘s novel by Cy Enfield; produced by Joe Levine, Enfield and Stanley Baker, Sands of the Kalahari was released “hot on the heels” of Zulu. Baker’s and Enfield’s maiden voyage into the world of film together; Zulu was a massive hit and Levine (who controlled the purse strings) wanted another film by the two men as soon as possible.

I watched this film one leisurely Sunday afternoon after the Pub had closed. I’d never seen it before (I was only eight years-old when the film was initially released and I don’t think my parents would have liked their over imaginative son watching this one) and the thing that stuck with me all those years ago was the baboons.

The story

A disparate group of passengers are flying on a commercial flight through Nairobi. Their plane develops technical problems and they are forced to lay-over in a small African town. One of the passengers finds out about a smaller “private” plane that will take a few of the passengers on ahead.

This German passenger, Dr. Bondrachai  (Theodore Bikel) goes around trying to get enough people interested in going to reduce the cost of the flight. The last person he approaches is English-woman Grace Munkton (Susannah York), she agrees and the flight is on. A last-minute potential passenger arrives as he plane is about to take off in the form of big game hunter Brian O’Brien (Stuart Whitman) who talks his way on board.

The plane takes off and in the middle of the desert hits a giant swarm of locusts and crashes into the Kalahari. With one of the pilots dead, and one of the passengers badly injured, Mike Bain (Stanley Baker), the survivors leave the crash site.

Leaving the crash site. Stuart Whitman and Nigel Davenport.
Leaving the crash site. Stuart Whitman and Nigel Davenport.

Although this film has not aged too well after all these years (some of the baboon shots look like small men in monkey suits, although fortunately, this only happens once for a few seconds) and the locust swarm plunges between impressive and hokey; but over all, the film still impresses.

The Cast

The cast is impressive. Apart from the actors listed above, it also featured Nigel Davenport and  Harry Andrews both well-known and well versed character actors.

Whitman as the survival extremist O’Brien, is brutal, selfish and handsome. This real life  Army veteran was a leading man and  worth a fortune due to wise investments over his career. Susannah York  was, then, a star in the making, When  younger, she resembled  Ingrid Bergman and enjoyed a long and busy career before her death in 2011.

Stanley Baker played the third point of this “love triangle” and I’ve saved him for last. Baker, like Richard Burton, came from Wales and because of his rugged good looks and his excellent acting ability soon became a star. As mentioned in the first paragraph, he produced and starred in the 1964 film Zulu. His untimely death at the age of 48 deprived the world of a great actor.

Summing things up

Sands of the Kalahari is an ensemble film, with an eventual focus on the “triangle” mentioned above and O’Brien’s  repeated bullying of a troop of baboons who live in the rocks where the group have taken shelter. Baboons are aggressive creatures and quite vicious when attacked (in the film at any rate) and O’Brien’s constant torture and killing of the animals can only end badly.

I found this on Netflix last night and I was overjoyed. I had not seen it since that Sunday afternoon viewing years ago. It is an impressive film and I urge you to watch it while it’s still streaming.

A definite “retro” 4.5 out of 5 stars.

Just for fun – Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor were originally cast as Munkton and O’Brien. Susannah York was brought in to replace another actress and Stuart Whitman was the fourth choice to play O’Brian. *IMDb*

O'Brian in full survivor mode.
O’Brian in full survivor mode.

Discover more from Mikes Film Talk

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Fediverse reactions

14 responses to “Sands of the Kalahari (1965) Retro Review”

  1. […] The screenplay was adapted from an article about Rourke’s Drift written by John Prebble. Cy Enfield talked to the Zulu historians to get a picture of the battle from ‘both sides’ and he […]

  2. 1965 was clearly the year for crashing a plane in the desert. I watched The Flight of the Phoenix last week and I’ve got The Sands of the Kalahari waiting on my DVR.
    Maybe I’ll save it for a lazy Sunday, post-pub.

    1. Sort of a pre-runner to all those disaster airplane films of the 70s! LOL Thanks for sharing that matey!! 🙂

  3. That always help! To be fair every time I was about to give up on it something interesting happened.

    1. LOL Like I said, even though it has not aged at all well, it was interesting to see what else Cy and Baker were producing outside of the superior Zulu! Thanks for taking the time to comment! Cheers! 🙂

  4. I enjoyed your review but I can’t say I enjoyed the film that much. It seemed to be stopping and starting, unsure of what it was about, and the fates of some of the characters should have been clearer. Fairly pedestrian compared to Zulu.

    1. Perhaps it helped to watch it initially after a pub trip. 🙂

  5. I liked this movie and reviewed just recently over at my blog. I agree that the locusts swarm effect is tacky and the weakest point of the whole movie. Susannah York does indeed look really attractive here. The only part I would disagree with you on are the baboons. As far as I could tell they were all real and not men in monkey suits. I thought Whitman’s final confrontation with them at the end was exciting. Overall a good movie.

    1. I did find the confrontation almost as exciting when I re-watched it, but sadly for me, the ability for me to suspend my disbelief was difficult. Still a powerful film and one that I enjoyed watching again. Thanks for stopping by and letting me know your thoughts. Cheers! 😀

      1. I also thought it was great that it was filmed on-location in the Kalahari. The shots of the desert where impressive.

  6. Sounds intriguing Mike! Nice post 😀

    1. Thanks mate!! It’s an “oldie” but goodie! 🙂

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Mikes Film Talk

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading