The 2011 film Dream House was a pleasant surprise. I had no real intention of watching the film. The marketing is pretty abysmal for the film.  But as it was streaming on Sky Movies I decided to give it a go. I’m glad I did.  It turned into a pleasant surprise, despite the somewhat jumbled editing and plot holes.

What it is

Jim Sheridan directs Dream House. The film stars Daniel Craig, Naomi Watts, Rachel Weisz and the film is a psychological thriller. Dream House is marketed as a horror film. The film was almost universally panned. by. Although that is usually the case when films are not screened for critics.

Problems

The other problem the film encountered was that Jim Sheridan had major problems with the producers Morgan Creek Productions. Morgan Creek took the film away from the director and did their own final cut on the film. Sheridan then  attempted to have his name removed from the production. Two of the film’s stars,  Craig and Weisz, also refused to do any publicity for the film.

Daniel Craig was completely disgusted by the final product.  In interviews after the fact revealed that he did not like the finished film. He did, however, meet his future wife Rachel Weisz on the project, so it was “a fair trade.”

The story

The film follows Will Atenton (Craig)  who has quit his desk job and is going to write a book. He has a leaving party and goes to his new home. The new house is away from the city and he starts his new job as novelist.  His family consists of wife Libby (Weisz), and their two daughters Trish and DeeDee.

The small family seem to have an almost idyllic life. Suddenly they start being threatened. Someone is watching their every move and the local police will not help them. Apart from a reluctantly helpful neighbour, Ann Patterson (Watts), no one in the small town is on their side.

Will decides he alone must help his family. He soon learns that the house  his perfect family live in was the scene of a gruesome murder.

Dream Home (2011): A Pleasant Surprise

it works

The story moves on quite well and the pacing, though uneven, is still on-par for the genre. Despite the director’s unhappiness  with the final product, it is overall a very satisfactory film. Dream House, for all its negative reviews is a pleasant surprise. The plot twists, are genuinely surprising. I confess that by the end of the film, I almost had a tear in my eye.

Almost.

It would have been nice to see the film that Sheridan, Craig and Weisz had imagined. It is not unusual for producers to snatch a film from  a director after disagreements arise. We can only wonder just how powerful the original vision might have been.

All the actors do a brilliant job in the film. Craig proved, once again, that he is not just a “Bond” one-trick pony. He had shown his acting chops well before he took on 007. It was nice to see those chops reaffirmed. Weisz is, as usual, a pleasure to watch. She always brings a huge degree of truth to any role she undertakes.

Naomi Watts does her standard good job as the neighbour who knows much more than she lets on. Honorable mentions go to Elias Koteas and Martin Csokas as the film’s two “boogie-men.”

the verdict

The film looks brilliant in terms of cinematography and set design. The switching between the “dream house” and its uglier more derelict appearance is done masterfully. There is just enough of a seam to show how the character’s were seeing it.

Plot holes and dangling storyline were not a huge issue. Although this actual plot device has been done before, most notably in Jim Carrey‘s The Number 23. Dream House is, overall, a pleasant surprise and well worth the time spent watching it. I was suitably impressed, despite the film’s troubled beginnings. I’d give it a four out of five stars for entertainment.

the trailer

Courtesy of Universal Pictures

Michael Smith

United Kingdom

11 September, 2013


Discover more from Mikes Film Talk

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Fediverse reactions

13 responses to “Dream House (2011): A Pleasant Surprise”

  1. […] John Krasinski is neither Brendan Fraser nor Harrison Ford. Natalie Portman is also not a match for Rachel Weisz. Neither is the cute and precocious male child a suitable replacement for Rick and Evie’s […]

  2. Hi Mike! 🙂 Is it strange I was looking at the DVD for this film specifically when I was in Blockbuster yesterday? XD Anyways good review, I was thinking about checking this one out and I think I may give it a watch now that you’ve said that its worth a watch.

    1. Definitely worth a look mate!! 🙂

  3. Good review, Mike! I wasn’t too impressed the first go but I may need to give it a re-watch soon. Like Dan said before me the trailers gave out way too much info.

    1. Luckily for me, I couldn’t remember the trailers! LOL Thanks mate! 🙂

  4. God, I remembered this. I didn’t hate it as much as everybody else in the world seemed to, but I do remember the trailers giving away almost everything in the movie from start to finish, and it was a real bummer. Nice review Mike.

    1. Thanks mate! Yeah, the trailer issue really grated with the director, he was furious!

  5. Now I’m really curious to see this. Thanks, Mike.

    1. No worries mate! It was surprisingly good!

  6. Saw this film ages ago and loved it…partially because Daniel Craig is just…well…yeah 😉
    But it was a nice surprise and twist on a cliche genre…a little-known film that deserves more recognition in my opinion 🙂

    1. Agreed! I cannot for the life of me remember why I was not interested in this film when it was released. Probably down to the marketing of the film when it opened! ;-p

      1. the marketing didn’t put me off at all to be honest, I got what I expected so I was happy!
        Gosh, I checked my old blog and it was a year ago in April that I watched it, damn…time for a rewatch methinks!!!

        1. Not a bad idea! I really enjoyed it!

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Mikes Film Talk

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading