The 2012 “true story” film Argo turned out to be a home run for Ben Affleck. I wrote about this film way back when I saw the first trailer and heard about the incredible events that inspired it.

That was way back on the 17th of August last year and it was aptly titled Argo (2012): A Truth Stranger than Fiction (just click on the previous link if you missed it the first time around) and I could not wait to see it at the cinema.

Of course if you’ve followed my blog for any time at all, you’ll know that my heart attack at the end of August pretty much messed up my cinema viewing for the last part of 2012. I finally got to watch it today (with the kind cooperation of iTunes who charged me for the privilege) and I was not disappointed.

What it does

Directed by Affleck (who also starred as the super spook Tony Mendez – the man who spearheaded this amazing rescue) and based on Mendez’s book, the film tells the “true story” of how six American Embassy employees escaped from the Iranian American Embassy one step ahead of rioting students who stormed the place in 1979.

The true story is in quotes because, like any other “true story” that’s been made into a film, not all the events are “gospel.” The very medium of film “fictionalises ” the story. Little Stevie King points this out in the book Danse Macabre. He Speaks of the film The Onion Field, a true story of a cop getting murdered in that field. He points out that no cameras were there at the deadly event. So the very act of filming the tale turns it into fiction.

What We Know:

That the Embassy was stormed and that a lot of the employees were held hostage. We also know that six folks hid in the Canadian Ambassador’s house. It is common knowledge that Mendez came up with a plan to get them out and that he worked with a makeup artist named John Chambers who enlisted the help of Lester Siegel to help the CIA to make a “pretend” movie. A science fiction film called, appropriately enough, ARGO.

Goodman and Arkin, what a double act.
Goodman and Arkin, what a double act.

*The best line in the film belongs to Alan Arkin’s character Siegel. He becomes irate answering questions about the fictitious film. He then says it stands for “ARGO F*ck Yourself” which then becomes the three-man teams catchphrase*

Truth here is subjective

So all the main events are true. But the mists of time and the very act of filming the story allows for creative license and a certain amount of padding to take place.

Does this take away from the film or the true events?

Not in my humble opinion.

All this license and padding help to make the film a real “edge of your seat” viewing experience. Even though I remember the event very well, I still sat on the edge of my seat during at least part of the film worried that these six people were going to get caught! In spite of my knowing they got out, I was stilled tight as a spring during the market scene. And the airport?

Don’t even go there!

Nail biting tension.
Nail biting tension.

Columbo

Affleck does a spectacular job of doing what I call, “A Columbo.”

I’ll explain.

In the 1970’s there was a weekly detective show called the NBC Mystery Movie. It featured several different detectives, McMillan & Wife, McCloud and Columbo. Now Columbo was different (and still is as far as I know) in that on his program, we the audience knew who the murderer was. The entertainment came from watching Columbo first figure out who it was and then trapping him or her by the show’s end.

ARGO uses a similar principle. We, the audience, know that the captured people get out of Iran. Affleck has just shown how it all worked out. It is a great premise. Great enough to win the film an Oscar for Best Picture. Just not for Best Director, but, we won’t go there. Despite the obvious snub by the Academy, ARGO had all the right ingredients to be a hit.

You cannot please everybody

Great story, great cast, great script and a great message. Okay a little too patriotic for some, but hey, you can’t please everyone. Just ask the Academy. I loved all the performances. John Goodman, Alan Arkin , Affleck, Clea Duvall who I did not even recognise, and of course Bryan Cranston. I got completely excited when I realised that Malcolm’s dad from Malcom in the Middle was going to be in this film. And playing a serious part.

*Side Note: I’ve been a fan of Arkin since Freebie and the Bean.*

Look! It's Malcom's dad Hal and he's with Ben Affleck!
Look! It’s Malcom’s dad Hal and he’s with Ben Affleck!

But to get back on track here, I just have to say that I loved the film. So much so that now I’m going to have to see all the films that Ben Affleck has directed.

I am curious though, does anyone else have a special affinity with the film’s subject matter? This 1979 event changed my life. I joined the USAF as a result of the Embassy takeover in Iran and my future was changed as a result. In fact, I probably would not be here typing this OP/ED, I’d be a cop in a small town somewhere or perhaps building houses.

Where to watch

Argo can be streamed on various platforms. YouTube, Prime, AppleTV, et al. None of these offer free viewing options. So if you have a spare $3.99 hanging around watch it if you have not already.

The trailer

Courtesy of Rotten Tomatoes Coming Soon


Discover more from Mikes Film Talk

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Fediverse reactions

33 responses to “Argo (2012): A Home Run For Ben Affleck (OP/ED)”

  1. […] John Goodman, alongside Stephen Root who plays Hymie, portrays the outspoken ‘B’ filmmaker Frank King. Goodman’s King may just have the best comic line in the entire film. When chasing out a representative of the “opposition” Frank states that he makes films “for the p*ssy and the money, both of which are falling out of the trees,” One of those moments that if this was not what Frank really said, it should have been. […]

  2. […] Argo (2012): Ben Affleck Hits a Home Run […]

  3. “So much so that now I’m going to have to see all the films that Ben Affleck has directed”.

    He’s a pretty great director, really underrated. I don’t care for him much as an actor though. I loved Argo, I was rooting for Life of Pi, but I was fine with Argo winning.

    1. Life of Pi is still on my list of must sees. The book was brilliant and based on that alone, warrants a look!

  4. One of my favourite films of 2012. Excellent review!!

  5. Great film and an even better review, good job bud. Nice site by the way, I am now following. I just started my own film blog and would love for you to check it out. Hope you like what you see.

    1. Hey! Thanks mate! I’ll drop by and return the favour! We film fanatics have to stick together! Cheers mate! 😀

  6. Great review! This is definitely on my watch-list 🙂

  7. I saw this film a while ago and at first I thought it was boring and then half way through I got into it and be the end I really cared about what happened to the characters and I did find myself on the edge of my seat. It was a strange experience for me.

    1. I agree with you, the film had a great “build” factor! 😀

  8. Interesting analysis of the film. Argo for me was a lot better than I had expected, however films of this genre really aren’t my cup of tea so that’s why I don’t rate it as highly as everyone else does.

    By the way, just wanted to let you know that even though you’ve recieved this award already, I’ve nominated you for The Very Inspiring Blogger Award: http://hypersonic55.wordpress.com/2013/03/21/the-very-inspiring-blogger-award/

  9. Just saw this Saturday and liked it a good deal. I was around “back then” but I was two. I think I was indifferent toward it.

    1. Yeah, being two does reduce the effectiveness of the event in the toddler world, unless of course, said toddler was at the embassy when it fell! 😮 LOL

  10. We’re on total opposite ends, here, Mike. Affleck did not got nominated and IMHO the Academy was correct in not nominating him. His work as a director, not to mention as an actor, is over-rated. Without going into too much detail, the movie was way too many endings. It should have ended with the plane taking off at the end, and them escaping, period. It was a literal “high” note and should have stayed there. But that’s not Ben’s fault – that’s the way movies are today. Nobody knows how to end a movie today…they always have to end them “edgy” or whatever…never happily. God forbid, never happily. So, point is, to have Ben’s character reunite with his wife and kid at the end….for the more intimate ending, I guess…was just…for my money…confusing. By the time he did that I forgot he had a wife and kid in the first place! I’m like, “Who’s she?!” And beyond the downer ending (and multiple endings and Ben not knowing how or when to end the movie)…I couldn’t see anyone’s face in the film…with all those cuts off the foreheads, etc. Just place the friggin’ camera on the actor, full screen, and let them act for pete’s sake. Anyway, just too many other meandering things wrong with this film; it was just a drag. As I said, it lifted me up when they escaped…and then came tumbling down…at the “end.” So, there ya’ go!

    1. Oh well, as they say, different strokes for different folks! Thanks for sharing dude!! 😀

  11. Good review Mike. I didn’t love this movie like so many others did, but at least it kept me glued to the screen and totally entertained. Not perfect, but alright.

    1. Agreed! It was entertaining! Not completely factual, but entertaining. I think if they’d gone for the more “factual” route the film would have been 5 hours long! Thanks mate!!! 😀 Oh and thanks for the follow! I’ve returned the favour!! 😀

  12. Interesting to hear how the events affected you, however I had some problems with this film. You can read them later. Overall good film 😀

  13. I just got this one from a coupon on my tablet. I can’t wait to see it 🙂 Great review!

    1. Thanks mate!! It certainly entertained the hell out of me!! I’ve also just finished the book. I’m debating on whether or not to do a review of it. That will make THREE posts on this one subject. Too much? Hmmmm. 😀

      1. Did you have a review on Goodreads? And I love reading your reviews 🙂 Go for it! 😉 I’ve been debating to read the book..haha!

        1. Not yet! although I normally write the review on here and then provide the link…*Smacks forehead* Of course you know that because you just said that you read my reviews…Now where did I put my SMART hat…
          😉

        2. I usually read your reviews here because I get it directly to my email. haha! Goodreads is mostly to track my reading and I’ve been so slow adapting to reading on my tablet..

  14. Great review Mike. I really enjoyed Argo, thought it was excellent. I did have a slight issue with how they made out like it was all down to the CIA though. They pretty much ignored how big a role the Canadians played and, not only did they ignored what the British and New Zealanders did (ie. helped house them for a few days before transporting them to the Canadian ambassador’s house) but if I remember correctly, they stated that they actually refused to help, which just isn’t true. I may have that wrong, but I’m pretty sure that’s how the film played it out.

    It didn’t detract too much from it though, I thought it was a really well made thriller.

    1. Yup, there’s that creative license kicking in! I’m reading the book at the moment and Mendez wrote about all that. The film also makes out that he was separated from his wife and young child; in reality, he was not separated and his KIDS plural weren’t that young. LOL Cheers mate! :- D

  15. Oh, yes, Mike. I loved the film (and I was around then). The film captured that end of the 70s in feel and context. And ‘Argo’ handled the mix of tones so very well. Fine review, my friend.

    1. Thank you very much mate!! 😀

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Mikes Film Talk

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading