Watching Tombstone (1993) a film that looks at the OK Corral and after, I realised that I have been fascinated by this bit of history.

For years.

So I sat down today and started researching the film and its subject matter again. I am not a stranger to the town of Tombstone and the disputes and daily arguments between the main factions. I have always had a fascination for the infamous gunfight at the OK Corral and the Earp’s ride of retribution afterwards.

The Story

That the gunfight and the events following are almost common knowledge is down to the feuding newspapers of the day. One paper supported the Earp’s and their ‘town’ backers of businesses and traders. The other paper supported the Clanton’s, Sheriff Johnny Behan  and their ‘cattlemen’ supporters.

The film shows this divide from the very beginning. The ‘Cowboys’ were an organised crime outfit that not only rustled cattle, they robbed and murdered and were even thought responsible for the murder of Mexican troops who were on their way to deposit gold,  bullion and Peso’s in the Tombstone banks.

That there was tension between the two factions is a matter of fact. Kurt Russell‘s portrayal of Wyatt Earp is easily the best I’ve ever seen. He hits the right notes of righteousness and weariness of the law business and his intention to settle down with his wife and family around him.

It works because of the cast

Sam Elliot and Bill Paxton (in the first role where he actually plays a good guy) played their parts equally well. Elliot as the stiff-necked and doomed Earp brother Morgan and Paxton as the eager and righteous (and most experienced of all the brothers in the world of law enforcement in real life) Virgil both help bring this strong willed family to life.

Michael Biehn, Powers Boothe, Jason Priestly, Val Kilmer and Dana Delany all provide the ambiance and backbone of the film. Kilmer (who lost so much weight to play the consumptive Doc Holliday that he made himself ill) almost stole the show as the man who could not fear death as it was already a constant companion.

Biehn as the over educated yet bestial Johnny Ringo and Boothe as the overbearing Brocius were brilliantly cast as the two ‘main men’ behind the Cowboys gang.

stunning

The film looks stunning capturing the colours and hues of a ‘boom town’ in the late 1800’s American west. The sets, the costumes and the props all look great. Overall this film shows the greatest attention to the facts leading up to and following the infamous gunfight. There are a few things that the film makers have chosen to change or gloss over, but the fact remains that this film is pretty damn accurate.

Tombstone. Allen street 1880

the gunfight

The actual gunfight is a perfect example of the ‘liberties’ taken by the film makers. In reality the entire gunfight at the OK Corral lasted under 30 seconds. Ike Clanton and Billy Claiborne both fled the area when the fighting started and Ike did tell Wyatt that he was not armed, to which Wyatt replied, “Get fighting or get out. [sic]”

No one entered a   photo  studio to be shot down.

Incredibly, most of the important details they got right. Virgil Earp does give Doc Holliday the sawn off shotgun.He then takes the walking stick in return. The Earps enter the vacant lot behind the Corral not expecting a fight. Sheriff Behan who meets the Earp’s as they were walking towards the Corral. He tells them that the Clanton’s were not armed.

This is a lie.

Virgil calls for the Clanton’s to turn over their weapons. Guns are pulled and cocked by the gang. Virgil shouts out, ” Hold! I did not mean that (or ‘Hold on! I did not mean that!). Someone opens fire simultaneously from each side opened fire simultaneously.

Behan did attempt to arrest the Earps immediately following the gunfight. Wyatt did indeed say, “I won’t be arrested today. I am right here and am not going away.”

Reality times two

In reality there was a trial. The Earps and Holliday were found innocent of any wrongdoing. This inflamed the already bitter feud between the Cowboys and the Earps.

That Wyatt Earp and Josephine Marcus were a couple was common knowledge at the time.

Russell had his own feud with Kevin Costner about the film. Costner was meant to be in Tombstone. The disagreement caused Costner to leave the project. He started up his own version of events in the the mediocre Wyatt Earp (1994). Costner then lead a ‘hate’ campaign against Russell’s film. Attempting to prevent it from getting distributed by any major studio.

Suffice to say that history repeated itself with Russell’s Earp’s winning against the nefarious actions of the pretender (Costner). Tombstone opened well and pulled in a decent box office receipt. Costner’s film did not do as well.

Childhood memories

I can vaguely remember as a child travelling through Arizona with my parents. We stopped at Tombstone and someone (dammed if I can remember who) took pictures of the OK Corral for our own posterity. The tourist two enacts the entire gunfight for thousands if not millions of tourists every year. I have never seen one of these re-enactments. I do not need to see it. The entire thing is in my mind already.

Of course if I’m feeling lazy, I can always watch Tombstone.

Because folks, it’s about as accurate as you can get.

*If you’d like to read more about the Earp’s and the gunfight at the OK Corral, check out Wikipedia. It’s a good starting point and will reference many different sites for more information. Head for the sites first. *

The Verdict

It is not surprising that I have given Tombstone a full 5 stars despite their adjusting certain things. If I want “truth” I will read a history book or watch a documentary. Tombstone is streaming on Hulu and rented on Prime.

The trailer

Courtesy of Cinematic Movie Trail
ers

POSTSCRIPT: In revisiting this opinion piece, I found it needed updating. Enjoy.

Michael Knox-Smith

USA

28 July 2024


Discover more from Mikes Film Talk

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Fediverse reactions

26 responses to “Tombstone (1993): OK Corral and After (Updated)”

  1. […] almost a literal view of the westerns genre, the two main protagonists resemble Wyatt Earp and Doc Holliday. I have not read the Parker book which the film is based on. So it is not clear […]

  2. […] for Sam Elliot and directed by Brett Haley, The Hero is a loving homage to the star and his long running career as […]

  3. […] same, heck, the romance in the new film is not the same either. It lacks, obviously, the late great Bill Paxton and the awesome Helen Hunt. However, the base of the tale is the same. Coming home again to fix […]

  4. […] became that “Twister Two”want to be. It was our fix to a follow up to the Helen Hunt, Bill Paxton instant classic. A film not just about tornadoes but much more. Twister was about human […]

  5. […] Wyatt Earp, Costner’s own version of the legendary lawman, the pacing is far too slow. Moments meant to […]

  6. […] with all the authority of Wyatt Earp, Russell makes the line as serious as a heart attack. The bigger man stands disbelieving but does […]

  7. […] with all the authority of Wyatt Earp, Russell makes the line as serious as a heart attack and the bigger man stands disbelieving but […]

  8. Michael,

    I completely disagree with your last statement “Because folks, it’s about as accurate as you can get.” Event for event, Costner’s “Wyatt Earp” is MUCH more accurate. In particular, the gunfight sequence in Costner’s version is much more in line with the testimonies of witnesses during the trial. While many witnesses disagreed and slanted their statements in favor of one side or the other, the actions of each participant is relatively clear. Here are some inaccuracies within Tombstone:

    1. Nothing in the testimony even hints that Doc ran from the far right side of the lot to the far left shooting over his head into Fly’s. This would be impossible since, by the end of the fight, he was lying on the ground far to the right of Wyatt and Virgil with a wound to his hip (see #3).

    2. Nothing in the testimony suggested that Doc fired his shot gun into the air. Had he done so, he would have shot Tom with only one barrel. After the fight, it was documented that Tom’s death was due to TWO shot gun blasts to the chest.

    3. Doc was wounded by a shot from Frank when Frank stumbled onto the street behind Doc and Morgan. The bullet didn’t penetrate and left a large bruise. ‘Tombstone’ does not capture this event.

    4. Frank McLaury died on the street from a head shot by Morgan. Tom McLaury also died on the street while crawling/stumbling away from the lot. ‘Tombstone’ shows both dying in the back lot.

    5. While impossible to ever confirm, the testimony did strongly suggest that Virgil didn’t even reach for his gun until after the first shot was fired. In ‘Tombstone’, Virgil grabs for his gun before the shooting starts.

    6. The silent stand off before the shooting starts was a Hollywood fabrication. Per the testimony, after Virgil shouted “Hold! That’s not what I want”, the shooting immediately began (or, as some witnesses say, it began simultaneously with Virgil’s command to ‘hold’) and “became general”.

    7. Witnesses testified that Morgan stated “You sons a bitches have been looking for fight and now you can have it”. This was not covered in ‘Tombstone’.

    8 Mrs. King testified that, when the Earp party walked past her position in front of the store, she heard Morgan say “Let ’em have it” to Doc. This was not covered in ‘Tombstone’.

    9. Kilmer’s portrayal of Doc is terribly misleading. Doc was a gambler, an alcoholic, a hot head, and a lunger but he was not the suave calculating gunfighter as portrayed in ‘Tombstone’. In reality, Doc was very much a human with human frailties. Being lonely and having been imbued with the importance of loyalty from childhood, he bonded with the Earps and they served as substitutes for his own family in GA.

    I would ask that you give Costner’s version another try. I admit that it is a little dry and slow at some parts, but, historically, it is much more accurate.

    1. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and giving an excellent break down of the actions, “on the day.” If you will notice, I did actually point out that the film makers did take liberties with the gunfight portion of the film. Obviously this is a subject you hold very dear and have spent much time on. While I have a fascination with the old west and Tombstone, I watch films to be entertained. I do not enjoy films that are “a little dry and slow” and avoid them. If I want “dead” accuracy of events, I’ll watch a documentary. I’ll stick to my guns (sorry couldn’t resist) and still say the Tombstone is the better film. Cheers mate! 🙂

  9. In the sixth paragraph of your review you did a switcheroo. Sam Elliot plays Virgil and Bill Paxton plays Morgan, not the other way around:
    “Elliot as the stiff-necked and doomed Earp brother Morgan and Paxton as the eager and righteous (and most experienced of all the brothers in the world of law enforcement in real life) Virgil both help bring this strong willed family to life.”

    1. Guilty as charged, I keep meaning to change that the right way around. Thanks for pointing that out. Cheers.

  10. […] Tombstone (1993): OK Corral and After (mikesfilmtalk.com) […]

  11. […] Tombstone (1993): OK Corral and After (mikesfilmtalk.com) […]

  12. […] Tombstone (1993): OK Corral and After (mikesfilmtalk.com) […]

    1. Hey! Thanks for the ping back!!! Cheers mate!!

  13. […] Tombstone (1993): OK Corral and After “So I sat down today and started researching the film and its subject matter again. I am not a stranger to the town of Tombstone and the disputes and daily arguments between the main factions. I have always had a fascination for the infamous gunfight at the OK Corral and the Earp’s ride of retribution afterwards.” […]

    1. Hey thanks for putting my little ole blog on your Slide post! Oh, and for the pingback! Cheers mate!

  14. I am going to have to go ahead and disagree with you on this one–I thought this film was filled with overacting particularly with Russel and Kilmer as Doc Holiday. For me at least the drunk with the silver cup thing got old real fast.

    1. Oh well, to each his own! Different tastes in films is to be expected, if we didn’t have that, films would truly be boring. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this one. Cheers mate!!!

      1. I agree with you on that! Agreeing to disagree makes it a free society–keep up the good work.

  15. Ah, one of my absolute favorite movies, and one of my favorite westerns! I actually only saw this a few years back for the first time, and after I’d finished it, I literally went out to buy it. (No joke) Wyatt Earp has always been a real favorite of mine, and Russell not only looked the part, but his delivery was wholly believable. Loved it. And Kilmer was the perfect second to Russell. Heck, the whole cast was awesome, although I really wanted to run Ike over with a bus or something. I had no idea that Costner was dumping all over Russell’s efforts with ‘Tombstone’; what a bum thing to do. I liked his film alright, only because it explored more of Earp’s life, but he was definitely no Russell, and definitely no true Earp. I didn’t really like Quaid as Doc either. The film just lacked the charm and excitement of ‘Tombstone’. Anyway, great review, Mike!

  16. The first movie I went to see (with Mom) was “Gunfight at OK Corral.” I watched it from the second row, so Burt and Kirk had heads 20 feet high each. It left an indelible mark on my consciousness. I saw every OK Corral/Earp/Tombstone movie since — and when it became possible, before — but “Tombstone” is my favorite. It is nominally more accurate. It omits a lot of history, but had it been included, not only would the film have been a mini series, it would have put the audience to sleep. We don’t go to see westerns for full historical details: we want to see a legend.

    This is the best version of the legend I’ve seen. We own it on DVD, and BRD. The DVD “long form” has an extra disc with interviews, background, etc. I don’t usually watch this stuff, but in this case, I made an exception. I have watched the “extra material” almost as often as the movie. The interviews with Kilmer and Biehn are my favorites.

    Garry and I made the pilgrimage to Tombstone. I’ve had people argue with me that it was really cut on a stage set, but unless this entire town had a mass hallucination and merely thought a movie company had come, rebuilt the town to look like historical Tombstone, then filmed it — mass hallucinations aren’t nearly as common in the real world as they are in Hollywood — then they filmed the movie in actual Tombstone.

    I have pictures. We were there. We bought tee shirts. It was our favorite part of a long sojourn to the southwest. I hope we get back one more time before we are too crotchety to enjoy it. They may have done some re-shooting on a set, but the bulk of the film was made in Tombstone. It was and remains the only thing of note to happen there in more than 100 years and everyone talks about it.

    August was not the best time to visit. Temps reached 128 and never dropped below 120 during daylight. It was painfully hot. Maybe that’s what the fighting was really about. It was so damned hot, people got cranky and shot each other. That’s what they do in L.A., right?

  17. Another that I loved and need to re-watch. Just haven’t got around to it.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Mikes Film Talk

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading