The 2016 horror/thriller film I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House is, in a word; slow. While different on a lot of levels, this is a hard watch, precisely because it is so slow paced.

Written and directed by Oz Perkins (son of Anthony), I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House is his second feature sitting in the driver’s seat and it shows promise beyond measure. Starring Brit actress Ruth Wilson (The Affair, Luther) and the brilliant Paula Prentiss  the film is a slow moody prospect that will not necessarily appeal to all audiences.

Classed as a thriller, the movie with the overly long title feels like a combination of Repulsion and The Turn of the Screw. There is even a touch of Ty West’s The Innkeepers in the film’s slow-paced presentation.

The Story

Wilson plays Lily, a home hospice nurse, or carer. She has moved in with Ms. Blum (Prentiss) to look after her until she dies.  Blum was an author when she was younger and a character in one of books is named Polly (played by  Lucy Boynton).

Ms. Blum continually calls for Polly and this motivates Lily to read one of her employers old books.

The nurse is a highly imaginative and easily spooked young woman, she is 28 in the film, and she appears to have no friends, or perhaps one as Lily calls someone early on.

I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House is painfully slow. Its   pacing is one step away from being too much for the viewer to endure.  As it crawls toward a conclusion the atmosphere and overall feeling of foreboding manages to justsave it from being boring.

Casting is All

Wilson is a capable actress; one who portrays any character with conviction and a certain amount of truth.  However, the voice-over, which feels a tad too grammatically correct; like a school teacher reading from a textbook, almost kills the mood.

It is an intrusion to the carefully built up tension of Lily. A woman who is literally frightened by her own shadow who must battle her  overly zealous imagination.  The narration does carry the story forward to an extent but it is maddeningly off-putting.  It throws the narrative more often than not.

Paula Prentiss manages to make Ms. Blum a sad and forlorn victim in her own house.  The look of the former author is that of shell shocked survivor. As the film progresses she becomes slightly more verbal but by then it is too late. Anything she may say will not stop this film reaching its forgone conclusion.

It Almost Misses

As thriller’s go, this ghost tale set within another ghost story,  comes close to missing the mark.  Perkins almost undercuts himself. Playing down the scare factor to concentrate on the atmospheric off-kilter feeling of the house and its two occupants almost kills off any real satisfaction at the movies climax.

Lily’s whispered delivery of what she is either thinking or reading throughout really is the one thing that hurts the overall film.  Although it does allow for enough confusion to suppose that she is going mad from the near solitude of her position.

When I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House reaches its climax, it really does feel a bit like an homage to The Turn of the Screw. We have to ask ourselves if the young nurse experienced everything seen or was it an illusion.

The Verdict

Oz Perkins’ second feature length film is a sold 3.5 stars for its very dark and moody presentation.  The film’s atmosphere counts for a lot, overcoming its lack of a big scare.

I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House is streaming on Netflix as an “original” production. Head on over and see what you think. It is definitely worth a look, or two.

The Trailer

 


Discover more from Mikes Film Talk

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Fediverse reactions

4 responses to “I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House (2016): Slow”

  1. […] Osgood Perkins writes and directs this oddball serial killer tale. Longlegs is an “outside the box” horror that features a number of nods and winks to real serial killers. Perkins uses his team; DOP Andres Arochi, editors Graham Fortin and Greg Ng and the rest of the gang to bring us into this 1970’s and 1990’s environment. […]

  2. I didn’t understand it. How did Lily die? Was she already dead? I’m confused.

  3. Painfully long and boring.

    1. I didn’t understand it. Did you? I was sp disappointed

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Mikes Film Talk

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading