Some Kind of Hate (2015): Unjustly Panned (Review)

Poster for Some Kind of Hate

The 2015 horror film Some Kind of Hate has been unjustly panned by almost every critic who sat down and watched the film.  Charges that the movie is overly gory and not scary have been levied against the feature as well as the film not being overly original in its theme.

Certainly “bullying” films are nothing new. There have been a slew of films dealing with kids returning from the dead to wreak vengeance on former schoolmates. Every country in the world, it seems, has produced a movie along these lines. (Japan, Korea – most recently with the 2004 film  Witch Board and in the same year Dead Friend, aka The Ghost, the list is long.)

However, the setting of this film, a “reform school” (or more accurately an alternative school for kids who cannot get along with others) is new. This is not in a regular academic facility, all these students are naughty and here for various infractions.

Lincoln Taggart (Ronen Rubinstein) has a horrible home life, where he is bullied and at school a group of lads target the boy. They make his life a misery until he snaps and stabs the ring leader in the face with a fork. 

Taggart is sent to a “bootcamp” type of alternative school although it is referred to as a “reform school.” There he finds that the bullying has not stopped, it just has a different set of faces.

His new friend Kaitlyn (Grace Phipps) is a reformed bully. As Lincoln’s days are made increasingly uncomfortable by the  new gang of thugs, he wishes that they were all dead. 

His sincere wish initiates an introduction to a new friend; Moira (Sierra McCormick). She is the vengeful spirit of a girl bullied years before at the school, until she took her own life.  The dead student starts killing the other kids whether they are bullying or not. 

The staff at the facility have a dark secret and Lincoln tries to stop his deadly new friend from killing everyone.

Some Kind of Hate was directed by Adam Egypt Mortimer, who co-wrote the screenplay with Brian DeLeeuw, and the film does a good job in dealing with the issues of bullying and its consequences.  It also climbs into the mind of an average angsty teen with little effort. 

The only real complaint about the film would be that there was not nearly enough Noah Segan (Looper, Brick) as this actor is memorable in any role he plays.

Disney actress McCormick is spot on as the homicidal wraith who latches onto Lincoln after his heartfelt wish.  Phipps is also very good as the bad girl gone good and Rubinstein is brilliant as the tortured and somewhat fragile teen who fights back.

There are, as charged, copious amounts of claret spilled throughout the film. However there is no overabundance of viscera on offer. (In fact there is not one internal organ to be seen.) The gore is limited to blood spray and pools of the stuff on the floor.

Moira does use her razor to dispatch those she deems worthy of punishment though and the cuts, while looking rather authentic are not over top.

Some Kind of Hate is a solid horror film that may not scare so much as disturb. There may be no danger of popcorn becoming airborne at any point but this is a great little low budget feature.

The film is a solid 3 stars and is streaming on Netflix right now. Horror fans expected a lot of jump scares with their slasher film will be disappointed but the movie  is worth a look.


Looper (2012): Time After Time?

Written and directed by Rian Johnson (Brick, The Brothers Bloom), Looper stars Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Bruce Willis, Emily Blunt, Paul Dano, Noah Segan, Jeff Daniels, and Pierce Gagnon as Cid the future Rainman. It is a science fiction/thriller/action film that takes place in the year 2044 and its main plot device is time travel.

Joe (Gordon-Levitt) is a looper. Loopers, it appears, came into being right after time travel is invented in 2074. Immediately banned and made illegal by the government; the new time travel is used by huge criminal organizations as a sort of “Murder’s Inc” where “hits” are sanctioned and sent back to the past to be carried out by a looper.

So in the future hitmen become loopers and in the sense that some things never change, time travel is a criminal’s wet dream; presumably allowing more than just murder to fly the “airways.” When the target arrives in the past, he lands on a tarpaulin; hands tied behind his back and his head covered in a cloth bag.

The second he appears, the looper shoots him and rolls the body over to collect his “Judas” fee of silver bars. In an ironic twist, the loopers work for criminals from the future in the past. If you try to figure it out, you’ll just give yourself a headache. So don’t try, even Old Joe (Willis) says it’s beyond explanation (unless you use straws and salt).

In this world of murderous loopers one way to retire is when your future bosses send your future self back to be “whacked” this constitutes “closing the loop.” You get a literal golden handshake and you retire. Joe systematically does his job, learns French and relies on drugs to relieve the monotony of his existence.

When one of Joe’s fellow loopers, Seth (Dano) meets his future self, he is so shaken that he lets him escape. Seth comes to Joe for help and begs for a place to hide. Their boss Abe (Daniels) has already sent Kid Blue (Segan) to Joe’s apartment and they take Joe to see Abe. Joe then gives Seth up to Abe and gets to spend an hour with his favourite prostitute to ease his conscience.

Life goes back to “normal” which means Joe continues to kill his target at 11:30 in the morning and then go for coffee later. One day, the target is late. When it does arrive, he has no bag over his head and his hands are free. Joe is stunned and in the split second it takes him to fire his blunderbuss, his target (his future self) turns and the shot goes into the gold bars on his back.

As Joe pumps another round into the gun, Old Joe hits him with a gold bar; knocks him out and escapes. Joe awakens a bit later with a note telling him to run and catch a train out of town.

Well, it’s 11:30! Time to shoot another target.

Now here is the only spot in the film that confused me. Joe (Gordon-Levitt) returns to his apartment and in the ensuing scuffle, he falls off a fire escape and knocks himself out. We are then treated to a longish montage of Joe actually shooting “Old Joe” and then “living” his life until he marries a Chinese woman and, as Old Joe, gets taken from his house and put into the time machine for his younger self to shoot him.

I was a little confused to say the least. But it did not matter. Any film that deals with time travel is going to be confusing. There are going to be plot holes and mistakes and bits in the film where you can hear the audible sound of everyone’s chin thudding on the ground. But as Bruce Willis’s character says, “It’s doesn’t matter.”

Purists are now pulling their hair and screaming, “Yes, it does matter damn it. What about the space time continuum, blah, blah, blah…”

I say again it does not matter; especially in the verse of this film.

I’ll explain.

Years ago the late Ray Bradbury wrote some excellent science fiction novels. The Martian Chronicles was just one example of his work; immensely popular it was made into a film (once or twice) and a television mini-series. The point about Bradbury’s work is this: when Ray told you that some astronauts took a rocket ship to Mars, that is all he told you. There was no song and dance about what powered the rocket or its payload or its dimensions. It was not pertinent to the story.

Now if you wanted science fiction that was all about the “science” you read Issac Asimov or one of his peers who would gladly give you all the science you might require from your Sy Fy story. The books by either author were equally entertaining but, both were written from a different point of view.

I always leaned more toward Bradbury’s stuff, because I like a good story and I don’t need to know how many booster rockets are needed to get out of the earth’s atmosphere. I feel the same way here about Looper. It’s story about time travel, I don’t need a lot of dithering about with someone trying to explain every little nut and bolt about it. It just is; and I’m fine with that.

The film was vastly entertaining. Even though I did have some problem with Emily Blunt being in yet another movie (I mean, come on guys, is she the only actress available at the moment or what) and as much as I adore Bruce Willis, he also seems to be in a lot this year.

It would probably be easier to list films that Emily Blunt has not been in this year.

Of course this is the third time that the team of Johnson and Gordon-Levitt have worked together. They are starting to look a bit like the Burton/Depp combination; let’s hope that they don’t wind up as stale.

But I have got to say that although I was a bit “freaked out” by the prosthetics used on Gordon-Levitt’s face to make him resemble a young Willis, I was impressed by the fact that Joseph has Bruce’s speech pattern and phrasing down perfectly. I really believed that he could be a younger version of Willis. Very, very impressive to say the least.

The film moves at break neck speed and shows a future that is bleak and violent and (like The Divide’s setting) dirty and hopeless. Joe’s existence before he meets Old Joe is a series of events that all run together fuelled by drugs and emptiness. Despite this depressing background, the movie manages to look like what we imagine the world to look like in 21 years.

I do have to say that I’m impressed that Rian managed to get a “hover cycle” into the film.

My final verdict is that this was a cracking film and I thoroughly enjoyed it. I’ll say it’s definitely a 5 star film worth watching and that I’m sorry I missed this at the cinema.

Bruce looks as upset as I am about the hoverbike not working.
%d bloggers like this: