Being Paid to Watch Movies: The Dream Job?

Seth Rogen and James Franco in The Interview

Seth Rogen and James Franco in The Interview

Anyone who knows me or has read my blog will know that I am a devout cinephile. I adore films and all the creativity and magic that goes into making them. So while I worked as the Entertainment Deputy Managing Editor I was, essentially, paid to watch new movies and then to write what I thought of them. The dream job?

Pretty damn close…

Except…

There were a huge amount of “non press only” screenings where the critics and reviewers had to share the cinema with the “general” public.

Except…

General public was not really the correct term for the “people” who attended these early screenings. Speaking to the studio reps who ran these events, along with the local radio “personalities” and online film clubs, et al, there was a core group of folks who attended as many of these “free” shows as humanly possible.

This was a problem. You would think that getting to see films for free, some of which were not due for release for weeks, would be a great deal all on its own.

Wrong!

There were little groups, or subsets of cinema goers who felt “entitled.” Let me explain.

In the screenings, the studio reps and the folks who helped to set up the non press only screenings, certain rows of seats were cordoned off for the press and VIPs. Generally anywhere from one to four rows would be reserved. When I first arrived in Vegas, it had become standard practice for any press or VIP seats still vacant before the feature started to get filled by the general public.

This became a real problem where certain members of the public would hover around the empty seats and if one were, for example, being saved for a press member who had gone to the toilet (yes we do use the restroom) there could be scuffles. In one instance a journalist was punched by a member of the public.

That particular incident resulted in the rules changing. There were still people who, despite getting a film for free mind you, felt entitled to sit in the “good seats.” Their perception was that these seats must be better as they were reserved. Not so. They were just a few rows set aside without consideration as to viewing or position. Full stop.

It seems that Vegas was the exception and not the rule. Studio reps from Phoenix were amazed that the cinemas in Nevada had this problem. But then, Arizona reps had never opened up the press seats to the general public. Their viewpoint was that Mr and Mrs Public with their kids and neighbors were already getting a free film so “Shut up and sit down.”

The other “problem” in Las Vegas was that the huge amount of disabled viewers who got their free films, would argue over where they were going to sit. Despite the fact that there were places set up specially for them, they would complain and get quite angry if they had to sit in their motorized carts. Rather than take it up with the cinema owners, who are responsible for the amount of disabled seats, they would rip into the reps.

I learned quickly to despise the screenings that were not just for the press. In the beginning I did not mind the presence of “civilians” with attitude. Then they became intrusive, annoying, loud, talkative and were not even watching the film. At one point in a rather serious film, the fat couple behind me and another reviewer would not stop talking, loudly, throughout the entire film.

Finally I could take it no longer and turned around. “Do you mind?” “No,” the fat man retorted. I looked him in the eye. “Oh really?” He looked away and thankfully he and his wife shut the hell up. Afterward the studio rep told me off and said you should have told me, they would have been removed. I thanked her and said the next time I would.

What is amazing about the whole thing is that with cinema prices that go through the roof why not enjoy your free film? Why go there to talk to your wife, husband, girlfriend, boyfriend, neighbor, et al. You are there to watch a MOVIE.

Even worse was that these “entitled” idiots would fight to sit with the press, and once they got their way, they would would invariably make so much noise that you could not hear the film. Or constantly text their mates or keep getting up and down to look for folks they knew so they could brag about their great seat.

I remember explaining to one mentally challenged individual, he must have been as no one can be that stupid…can they? That most of us were paid to be there, it was our job. He sneered, “It must pay good.” One local critic sniffed and replied, “If you call $10 per article good, then yes!”

The whole thing had a Catch-22 feel to it. On the one hand, having a “real” audience in the cinema was, in a lot of ways, preferred. You could gage how well the film went over with the masses. This was especially important at “kids” films. It was easy to see which studios got it right. There were no, “Mummy I need to wee, I’m hungry, I’m thirsty.” You were also hard pressed to hear parents saying, “Sit down, five more minutes, let’s go out for a minute.”

Other times, the audience were an intrusion full stop. At one film, which was supposed to be a drama, a man and his family sat and laughed uproariously throughout. In that particular instance, I did complain to the rep and was told, “Sorry, he’s a regular and somewhat special.”

The one drawback to “press only” viewings was that your colleagues in the cinema, which was deserted except for the few of us who could make it, were mostly a jaded bunch. If the film was comedic in nature it was rare to hear anyone laugh. I suppose I broke all the rules and would, if it warranted it, really react to the film.

If it was funny I laughed. Sad, I cried (Yes, I cry at movies, silly old sop!) and if the film was really special and required a myriad of emotions, I provided all the reactions necessary. As I said, I love films. Even the “bad” ones.

Very few of my reviews were negative. I alway try to point out the positive things in movies although there are exceptions to this, I do try. My good friend Jacob Tiranno, and fellow member of the Nevada Film Critic’s Society, (and my “movie buddy”) liked the fact that I tried to see the best of the productions and would not slam a film that tried but did not deliver.

On the subject of Jacob, he does a podcast, on iTunes and on YouTube, head on over and give him a listen. I’ve done a few with him and he has a great show. Tell him I sent you. Also, stop by and check out the Nevada Film Critic’s Society a great site where a number of folks give their view of films on offer.

So in essence, being paid to watch movies was the dream job. Despite the intrusive audience. Although to be fair, there were a few folks who were great finds. A young and gorgeous civil rights lawyer was so nice I found myself wishing I were years younger…and taller. There were others, people who were cinephiles, or the next best thing to, and could intelligently talk about what they had just seen.

Like the interaction with the celebs I miss the free movies (Who would not?) and hopefully I’ll soon have a set of wheels that can get me to some Arizona cinemas as the reps still email me with offers of viewings. Until then I’ll watch my DVD collection and dream of that perfect job.
4 March 2015

Author: Michael Knox-Smith

Former Actor, Former Writer, Former Journalist, USAF Veteran, Former Member Nevada Film Critics Society (As Michael Smith)

15 thoughts on “Being Paid to Watch Movies: The Dream Job?”

  1. Agreed. The studios rely on these early screenings a lot. I’ve seen films delayed after audiences panned a screening. I’m not surprised that Seventh Son did poorly. Bridges is doing his version of Tommy Lee Jones, playing the same sort of role over and over and over…

  2. This one is pretty easy. Limited open that pulled in a total of $10,000 equals lack of studio faith in project and poor performance. Had they opted to open the film “properly” it might have found an audience. Studio’s do not want “lovely little movies” they want blockbusters and the only way the small films (a lot of which are brilliant) get noticed is by word of mouth advertising by audiences. Even this is no guarantee the film will do well at cinemas as a lot of movies do not pick up speed until they’ve been released in the Home Entertainment market…

  3. Let’s be blunt .. most movies are crap. It’s punishment to have to watch them. No pay would be enough.
    Movies are often pre-screened these days. Which determines whether – or what – distribution they may get. or how to promote them. or whether they need to be re-edited, re-shoot some stuff … or tossed.
    Sometimes this helps …
    Usually not.
    I believe Jeff Bridges Seventh Son was held back and reworked a bit.
    Didn’t help.

  4. I think it’s a combination of low budgets and lack of studio faith. I have seen what keeps a film from opening in certain cities first hand. A Reese Witherspoon film, “The Good Lie” screened in Las Vegas and performed abysmally. So bad, in fact, that the studios pulled it from opening in Vegas. I can only assume that films headed straight to DVD must perform badly across the board, so to speak.

  5. And why these are chosen for general release while some really fine little movies go as DVD only. I have no idea what criteria they use, if any.

  6. It is amazing just how many films are made and released in cinemas each week as well as the amount that go straight to video on demand and DVD. It is the hidden gems that I love finding! Still, I have to agree there are many films that make you wonder why anyone ever thought that they were worth making!

  7. I was going out to see moving four or five times a week and the pickings were slim. There are an awful lot of movies that are pumped out every week and they come and go without anyone hearing about them. There may be an overlooked gem in the bunch, but most deserve their ignominious fate.

  8. I know what you mean. Although, for the most part, last year was a good one for films. There was a stretch of about one week, with around 5 films out that week, and each one was abysmal. I can quite imagine that too many rotten apples in the mix would wind up getting to anyone!

  9. Some of the worst movies did okay at the box office. It didn’t mean they weren’t awful, just that they had a good PR department. As I said, there were some good ones, but the percentage of good vs. bad was depressing. Sitting through all those bad movies was getting to me.

  10. I know what you mean about the quality of the films, there were a number that, despite my not totally panning the final product had box office disaster stamped all over it. So I guess the old saying is true then, there are some films that you cannot pay someone to see! OLOLOL

  11. I used to be a checker. I went in and checked to see if the print was okay, sound levels right. That the promotions were included, as required by contract. No special audience, just free admission and bring a friend (Garry). The pay was almost nothing … not enough to cover the cost of gasoline. For the couple of years I did it, I saw dozens of movies, always on opening day at my local theater. All I had to do was fill out some online forms and email them to whoever was my boss du jour. Eventually, a few minuscule checks arrived. I stopped doing it because so many of the movies I had to watch were terrible … I mean really dreadful. And depending on who I was working for, I sometimes had to watch all the viewings on every screen, or at least a few minutes of each, which was a tactical nightmare. One day I saw Disney’s “Bolt” 14 times. Fortunately, I enjoyed it and didn’t mind … but sometimes, it was unbearable. I quit after all the heart surgery last year. Too many movies aren’t worth seeing at all, even for free. Even if they pay you. There are good ones too, but compared to the number of really AWFUL movies, I decide it was not worth it.

Discover more from Mikes Film Talk

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading